November 27, 2012 -- Updated 1859 GMT (0259 HKT)
Editor's note: Patrick Doherty is the deputy director of the National Security Studies Program at the New America Foundation and author of the forthcoming report, "Grand Strategy of the United States of America."
(CNN) -- Washington is all about the fiscal cliff 
these days. In Doha, Qatar, world leaders are negotiating over climate 
change. Federal debt and carbon emissions are indeed two big problems on
 the nation's front burner. But they are just the beginning.
As the fog of the 
election season lifts, America has a lot to worry about -- everything 
from competing economically with China to housing rapidly retiring baby 
boomers.
But there is another way 
to look at it. Decisively addressing the nation's primary global 
challenges -- backed by the market potential of powerful demographic 
shifts at home and abroad -- could yield opportunity unlike any other in
 America's history.
First, our four major challenges:
• In the last 20 years, 
households, businesses and the federal government accumulated 
exceptional levels of debt, which they are now trying, painfully, to pay
 down. The 2008 financial crisis triggered a spiral of unemployment and 
reduced demand that is nowhere near complete.
 As household income contracts, families consume less and try to erase 
debt, reducing demand for goods and services, forcing companies to 
reduce expenses, meaning more layoffs, deepening unemployment, and so 
on. Monetary policy and fiscal stimulus may have contained the worst of 
the pain, but they cannot cure the disease. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben
 Bernanke is right when he says the economy needs a broad-based and durable source of demand.
• Over the last 20 years, roughly 1 billion people entered the global middle class. In the next 20 years, there will be
 3 billion more. Good news? Yes, except that these new consumers use 
huge amounts of resources and emit more carbon, a roughly 300% increase.
 Expect price increases for basic commodities like energy, food, and 
minerals, and deepening conflicts among the great powers over resources 
in familiar places: the Persian Gulf, the South China Sea, and Central 
Asia.
• Climate change is 
already with us. Superstorm Sandy, the Derecho, Arctic melting, and 
droughts in the Midwest, India, China, and Russia this past year confirm
 the scientifically proven trend. Beyond this, humanity consumes about 
150% of the "goods" provided by the earth's natural systems -- including
 fresh water, soils, and fisheries. We are consuming our limited 
endowment of natural capital, reducing future returns while our global 
population expands to 9 billion. This is massively destabilizing, 
whether you're in New York City or Pakistan.
• Our infrastructure, 
systems, and supply chains are not designed for the scale or the risks 
of the 21st century. Transportation, financial, food, and industrial 
systems have choke points, are inefficient, and lack oversight and 
sufficient investment. They are magnifying threat and risk when they 
should be compartmentalizing them. Quiet disruptions in such things as rare-earth minerals (critical to high-tech manufacturing), auto parts, and computer hard drives have all hit industry in the last two years, for example.
America's economy must 
do some heavy lifting. Just as the country transitioned from war 
production to civilian production 60 years ago, it must now transition 
to sustainable production, while building a new American dream. If it 
can, the United States will be ideally positioned to rebuild our middle 
class, compete globally and pre-empt growing confrontation over 
resources.
We must adapt and once again define the future.
First, America has a 
homegrown demographic opportunity unlike any other. Driven by baby 
boomers and millennials, 56% percent of homebuyers say that they want 
the trappings of their American dream to be walkable and convenient, not car-dependent and isolated, and home prices already reflect this.
 From 2014 to 2029, these two largest American demographics, each 25% of
 the total population, will meet in the housing market as boomers empty 
their nests and as more millennials marry and have children -- creating 
the largest concentration of demand for housing since the period after 
World War II. To seize this opportunity, however, Washington needs to 
let cities and towns decide how to grow, and discourage the car-based 
population dispersal known as sprawl. Not only will this put Americans 
back to work in construction, it could reduce the environmental 
footprint by roughly a third.
Second, global demand 
for food and resources is skyrocketing. By 2050 global food production 
must increase by 60%, while soil and fresh water must be regenerated, 
not depleted. American farmers are held back by expensive, distorting, 
and antiquated Cold War era subsidies that essentially pay farmers to 
overwork the land and waste scarce water resources. We've already lost up to 50% of Iowa's topsoil, drained the Ogallala Aquifer, and created a fertilizer-based "death bloom"
 at the mouth of the Mississippi. While conventional agribusiness is 
enjoying high global prices, climate-related drought and floods have 
reduced the harvest to the lowest since the early 1970s. Shifting the 
worst of these subsidies from big commodity crops (like corn, wheat, and
 soybeans) to pay farmers to convert their operations to modern 
regenerative systems will help our farming families earn a more secure 
living and be better stewards of the land.
Finally, the world needs
 innovation. To accommodate 3 billion new middle-class aspirants in 20 
years, we will need to make our resources more productive while reducing
 the amount of carbon emitted. By focusing on advanced materials, energy
 and manufacturing, we can rebuild our middle class, supplying the jobs,
 wages, and returns Americans deserve. To lead this revolution in 
resource productivity, we must stop taxing work and start taxing waste.
Washington universalized
 the income tax to pay for World War II, when we had full employment and
 needed to subsidize resource extraction to get materiel to the Allies. 
Now we get 80% of federal revenues from taxing individuals,
 are suffering from long-term unemployment, and consume far more 
resources than Europe for an inferior standard of living. We're 
conserving labor and expending resources when we need to do the 
opposite.
We have the demand. Do 
we have the capital? Plenty. There are trillions of dollars in pent-up 
investment capital looking for reasonable, reliable returns, as the 
chairman of Goldman Sachs recently wrote.
Instead of Washington 
footing the bill, the federal government must reorient the Cold War 
subsidies for housing, agriculture, and resource waste and create a new 
generation of regional financing mechanisms. These new regional tools 
must connect Wall Street's capital to the infrastructure and innovation 
opportunities that will arise as regions plan for and build the future. 
If it's done right, we'll channel excess liquidity back into the 
productive economy and stop it from sloshing around as underperforming 
corporate cash, money market funds, and high-risk derivatives.
Yes, Washington must 
address the issue of the fiscal cliff and make progress on climate 
change. But isolated solutions will only waste precious time. Tapping 
into the new demand pools of the 21st century, unleashing pent-up 
capital, and shifting American markets to lead a revolution in resource 
productivity will position the United States to lead the world once 
again.
Follow @CNNOpinion on Twitter.

No comments:
Post a Comment